In 1999, the Town of Holliston constructed an addition to the fire station at 59 Central Street. This addition included three rear bay doors, each of which was ten feet from the rear property line. That tight space was not sufficient to provide access to the doors, rendering them unusable. So why did the board of selectmen propose such a design?
Those building plans were created with the intent that the town would at some point in the future purchase the additional property behind the fire station that would be needed in order to make the bay doors accessible and usable; and would also provide a drive-through.
However, after the addition was built, the board of selectment reversed course and ultimately decided against the purchase of the required rear property.
In 2013, the opportunity to purchase the abutting rear property was presented to the town. As noted above, the board of selectmen turned it down — thus deciding against a drive-through and against being able to use the three rear doors.
That same year, the fire station extended the 10 feet of pavement anyways, into the private property that the town did not purchase.
The extra pavement was added at the rear of the building and is an additional 10 feet over the property line into the 36 Exchange Street lot and into the 44 Exchange Street lot. (This is the newer, darker pavement that is now visible behind the building in the picture at the top of this page.)This additional pavement was put in place in order to provide access to the rear bay doors and to provide drive-through access to the municipal lot, ignoring the original building plans and specifications, ignoring the existing property lines, and ignoring the decision not to purchase the required property.
The drive-through access extends from Central Street, across the 36 Exchange Street property, across the 44 Exchange Street property, to the municipal parking lot on Exchange Street.
Many people, on seeing the new additional pavement, now assume that the area is some sort of public access; unware that it is private property and that the pavement was added illegally and against the decision of the board of selectment.
Our insurance company has put us on notice that if there are any accidents or injuries on the section of pavement that is on our property, we are liable.
We would like the town to remove the pavement from our property, thus restoring the area to the design specificed on the building plans as it was from 1999 to 2013; and to post signs instructing that the area is not a public drive-through or access.
Thank you for visiting.